
If you purchase the american version then they're factory locked for certain frequencies. For wireless they're reliable but they don't mitigate interference very well and as long as you select the correct regulatory domain then you'll be FCC compliant. If you are willing to put up with a reasonably steep learning curve then they're worth the work put in.Īmazon use them in their datacenters which is a statement of capability.

.png)
Ubiquity makes good wireless but mikrotik makes good routers.įor bang for buck you really cannot do better than Mikrotik. We are looking at mikrotik but haven't pulled the trigger yet. On our wireless side, we run almost all ubiquity. We had 1 router get hit but that was my fault. That is the source of the vulnerabilities that they have had. Be sure to firewall off your management network. We have around 500+ routers and switches. Don't run anything special like mpls, etc on the switches, only vlans. We are upgrading to the mikrotik switches away from cisco.

For switches we run a mix on cisco and mikrotik. In our core we run a couple ccr1072's and push 15Gbps while running mpls, bgp, ospf, openvpn and eoip tunnels. We tried running ubiquity edgerouter pro's but they can't handle the amount of vlans we run. CPU load is around 5% with nat, mpls, ospf and bgp running. Or biggest site has around 800 users and pushing 850+ Mbp. We have great performance and stability using them.
